PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.65%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 9.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
25.42%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 11.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.53%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PLTR's 8.23%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-6.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.34%
Similar R&D growth to PLTR's 2.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-1.48%
G&A reduction while PLTR shows 4.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
11.96%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.60%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
142.86%
Other expenses change of 142.86% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.14%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.12%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-0.30%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.57%
D&A change of 5.57% while PLTR maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
3.60%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 1.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-7.08%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 10.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.04%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 1.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-7.70%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 9.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.26%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 37.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.60%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of PLTR's 3.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-8.99%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 11.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.66%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.58%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 4.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.53%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 12.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.22%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 8.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 8.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.25%
Share count reduction below 50% of PLTR's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.03%
Diluted share change of 0.03% while PLTR is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.