PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.85%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 8.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.14%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 14.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.76%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PLTR's 4.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.09%
Margin expansion while PLTR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.04%
R&D growth while PLTR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
4.15%
Similar G&A growth to PLTR's 4.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
-0.50%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 8.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-52.94%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.76%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PLTR's 5.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-8.93%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 6.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.15%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.30%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.11%
EBITDA growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.91%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to PLTR's 6.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.81%
Operating income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.07%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 4.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
14.17%
Other expenses growth while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.97%
Pre-tax income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.25%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 3.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-14.66%
Tax expense reduction while PLTR shows 45.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.62%
Net income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.12%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 3.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.50%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 34.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.26%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 58.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 58.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.