PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.29%
Revenue growth 50-75% of PLTR's 20.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
2.38%
Cost growth less than half of PLTR's 16.64%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
14.23%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PLTR's 22.31%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
3.58%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 1.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.56%
R&D growth while PLTR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
20.87%
G&A growth less than half of PLTR's 51.50%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
8.70%
Marketing expense growth while PLTR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-856.25%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.35%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PLTR's 11.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
5.35%
Total costs growth less than half of PLTR's 12.59%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.30%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 1441.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.07%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.02%
EBITDA growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.45%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 7.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.96%
Operating income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.77%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of PLTR's 15.02%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
31.72%
Other expenses growth while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.12%
Pre-tax income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.91%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 6.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-135.24%
Tax expense reduction while PLTR shows 92.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
49.70%
Net income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.73%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 5.36%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
49.57%
EPS growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.22%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.18%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.