PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.65%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 9.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
18.76%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 6.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.38%
Similar gross profit growth to PLTR's 11.18%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-2.93%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 1.22% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.83%
R&D growth less than half of PLTR's 31.94%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
5.66%
G&A growth less than half of PLTR's 31.83%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
13.74%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.92%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-5.56%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.97%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PLTR's 20.15%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
12.99%
Similar total costs growth to PLTR's 17.20%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
2.67%
Interest expense growth less than half of PLTR's 22.90%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.81%
D&A growth 50-75% of PLTR's 12.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
9.18%
EBITDA growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.50%
Operating income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.03%
Pre-tax income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
21.31%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.09%
Net income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.29%
EPS growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.42%
Diluted EPS growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.17%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 75.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.25%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 75.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.