PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.60%
Similar revenue growth to PLTR's 11.31%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
12.43%
Cost increase while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
6.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PLTR's 79.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.61%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 61.42% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.69%
R&D growth while PLTR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
30.09%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
10.30%
Marketing expense growth while PLTR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
600.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 163.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
10.98%
Operating expenses growth while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.70%
Total costs growth while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.73%
Interest expense growth while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.38%
D&A growth less than half of PLTR's 41.67%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
9.44%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 82.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.84%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 84.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.33%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.85%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 83.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
111.36%
Similar other expenses growth to PLTR's 104.52%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
4.51%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 81.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 83.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.17%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of PLTR's 11.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
4.19%
Net income growth below 50% of PLTR's 82.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.07%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 84.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.96%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 91.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 91.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.29%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 94.76% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.33%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 97.93% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.