PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.31%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.84%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 5.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.78%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PLTR's 6.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.19%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.52%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 4.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-32.43%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-21.89%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.37%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-13.60%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.14%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 1.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.51%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.16%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 23.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.63%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 27.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.42%
Operating income growth 50-75% of PLTR's 27.18%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
21.22%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of PLTR's 31.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
1553.33%
Other expenses growth while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.13%
Similar pre-tax income growth to PLTR's 22.81%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
22.97%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to PLTR's 27.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.50%
Tax expense growth less than half of PLTR's 140.85%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
24.02%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 16.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
26.96%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 21.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
24.32%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 19.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
24.66%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 18.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.18%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 3.27% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.17%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 1.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.