PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.15%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 5.97%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
24.29%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 8.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.78%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 5.35%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.84%
R&D growth while PLTR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
7.54%
Similar G&A growth to PLTR's 9.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
18.30%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 5.23%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-166.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.52%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 5.40%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.55%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 5.96%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.60%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 12.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.84%
D&A growth 50-75% of PLTR's 13.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
9.78%
EBITDA growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.93%
Operating income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.70%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.29%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.70%
Pre-tax income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19636.84%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 27.93%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-8.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.49%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.11%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.91% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.91% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.