PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.58%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 1.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.93%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 5.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.94%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.71%
Margin expansion while PLTR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.52%
R&D growth 50-75% of PLTR's 14.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
6.94%
G&A growth while PLTR reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
4.02%
Marketing expense growth less than half of PLTR's 8.32%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-175.00%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 52.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
6.87%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 4.83%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-1.65%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 4.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.19%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 61.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.92%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.24%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 31.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.58%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 32.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-164.93%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 55.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.33%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 30.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.02%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 31.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.68%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-10.86%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 30.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.58%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 31.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.80%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 31.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.48%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 31.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.