PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.07%
Similar revenue growth to PLTR's 6.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
5.21%
Cost increase while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.01%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PLTR's 9.19%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.06%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 2.59% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.61%
R&D growth while PLTR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
18.18%
G&A growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.80%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
12.67%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 4.00%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-109.09%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 168.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
11.37%
Operating expenses growth while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.05%
Total costs growth while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.39%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 58.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.46%
D&A growth less than half of PLTR's 83.72%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
3.42%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 141.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.30%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 138.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.83%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 71.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.04%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 73.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
72.99%
Other expenses growth less than half of PLTR's 191.89%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.47%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 130.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 128.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.23%
Tax expense growth less than half of PLTR's 297.81%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.07%
Net income growth below 50% of PLTR's 124.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.76%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 123.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.45%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 124.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.45%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 123.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.81% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.37%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 6.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.