PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 3.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.95%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.16%
Gross profit decline while PLTR shows 3.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.24%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.23%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 9.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-20.07%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-18.69%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-34.78%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.74%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.70%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.81%
Interest expense growth while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-29.88%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.62%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.97%
EBITDA margin growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.79%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 123.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.44%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 122.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
214.89%
Other expenses growth while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.30%
Pre-tax income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.96%
Pre-tax margin growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.18%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.87%
Net income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.52%
Net margin growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.91%
EPS growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.38%
Diluted EPS growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.85% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 0.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.