PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 1.55%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
13.18%
Cost increase while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.70%
Similar gross profit growth to PLTR's 2.13%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-3.36%
Margin decline while PLTR shows 0.57% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.26%
R&D growth less than half of PLTR's 10.47%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
67.17%
G&A growth above 1.5x PLTR's 25.36%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
10.79%
Marketing expense growth while PLTR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-22.58%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.99%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.71%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.09%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.00%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 3.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.75%
D&A growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.95%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-0.45%
EBITDA decline while PLTR shows 48.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.77%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 46.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.20%
Operating income decline while PLTR shows 144.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.92%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 141.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-211.11%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 19.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.72%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 44.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 42.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.54%
Tax expense reduction while PLTR shows 29.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.44%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 67.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.10%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 64.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.38%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 65.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.38%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 63.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.08%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 1.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 2.74% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.