PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.58%
Revenue growth below 50% of PLTR's 4.27%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-2.94%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 7.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.08%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PLTR's 3.68%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.49%
Margin expansion while PLTR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.19%
R&D reduction while PLTR shows 0.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-32.91%
G&A reduction while PLTR shows 5.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-16.39%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-124.59%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-12.02%
Operating expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.24%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 2.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.92%
Interest expense growth while PLTR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.21%
D&A growth less than half of PLTR's 5.85%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
5.96%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 21.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.28%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of PLTR's 16.12%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
10.89%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 22.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.25%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of PLTR's 17.89%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-17.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.34%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 4.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.47%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.01%
Similar net income growth to PLTR's 13.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
10.36%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 8.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
11.11%
Similar EPS growth to PLTR's 11.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
11.15%
Similar diluted EPS growth to PLTR's 11.11%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.07%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 1.20% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction while PLTR shows 1.80% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.