PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.74%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 6.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
20.37%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLTR's 10.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.43%
Similar gross profit growth to PLTR's 6.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-3.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.25%
R&D growth while PLTR reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
34.12%
G&A growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.48%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
20.42%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.88%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-23.36%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 17.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
15.35%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLTR's 1.61%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
18.11%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLTR's 3.49%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
73.14%
Interest expense change of 73.14% while PLTR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
51.98%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.06%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 26.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.98%
EBITDA margin decline while PLTR shows 18.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.51%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 30.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.41%
Operating margin decline while PLTR shows 21.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.08%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 18.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.78%
Pre-tax income decline while PLTR shows 27.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.40%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLTR shows 18.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.75%
Tax expense reduction while PLTR shows 11.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.89%
Net income decline while PLTR shows 27.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.59%
Net margin decline while PLTR shows 18.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.00%
EPS decline while PLTR shows 26.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.01%
Diluted EPS decline while PLTR shows 26.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.82%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.61%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.