PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.26%
Revenue decline while PLTR shows 6.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.70%
Cost reduction while PLTR shows 14.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.25%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PLTR's 5.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.52%
Margin expansion while PLTR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.15%
Similar R&D growth to PLTR's 8.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-3.29%
G&A reduction while PLTR shows 0.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-0.62%
Marketing expense reduction while PLTR shows 6.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-187.57%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.65%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PLTR's 4.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-2.03%
Total costs reduction while PLTR shows 6.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.99%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.14%
D&A growth above 1.5x PLTR's 0.38%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
1.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PLTR's 6.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.42%
EBITDA margin growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.03%
Operating income growth below 50% of PLTR's 7.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.30%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-68.77%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 24.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.76%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PLTR's 11.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PLTR's 4.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.84%
Tax expense growth less than half of PLTR's 50.49%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.32%
Net income growth below 50% of PLTR's 7.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.58%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 0.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.34%
EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 6.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.34%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PLTR's 5.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while PLTR shows 0.83% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 1.86%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.