PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.64%
Revenue growth below 50% of PLTR's 14.06%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.37%
Cost growth less than half of PLTR's 19.02%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
3.90%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PLTR's 12.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.27%
R&D growth less than half of PLTR's 45.89%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
17.47%
G&A growth 50-75% of PLTR's 31.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
9.81%
Marketing expense growth less than half of PLTR's 37.63%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-8.44%
Other expenses reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.53%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PLTR's 37.83%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.37%
Total costs growth less than half of PLTR's 33.33%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-12.38%
Interest expense reduction while PLTR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.86%
D&A growth while PLTR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.07%
EBITDA growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.25%
Operating income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.96%
Other expenses growth less than half of PLTR's 57.91%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.96%
Pre-tax income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.90%
Tax expense growth while PLTR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.44%
Net income growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.34%
EPS growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.34%
Diluted EPS growth while PLTR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.03%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PLTR's 2.44%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.