PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.62%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
0.55%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
0.66%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.03%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.55%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-4.72%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-3.54%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.23%
Total costs growth less than half of ZETA's 11.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.02%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.67%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.98%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.10%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.47%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
72.77%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.85%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.19%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.63%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.12%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.45%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.10%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.12%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.