PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.50%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.28%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.56%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ZETA's 8.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.03%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.51%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.74%
Total costs growth less than half of ZETA's 11.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.09%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.34%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.46%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.56%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.92%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
68.00%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.00%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.14%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.94%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.47%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.94%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.