PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.36%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 16.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
3.88%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
9.31%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.87%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.16%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.71%
Similar total costs growth to ZETA's 11.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.00%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.98%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.29%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.85%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.16%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
69.05%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.33%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.21%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.38%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.83%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.44%
Share count reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
6.44%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.