PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.65%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 16.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
12.10%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
9.16%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.76%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.83%
Similar total costs growth to ZETA's 11.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.80%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.41%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.72%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.31%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.52%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-43.66%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
7.99%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.79%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.50%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.13%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.44%
Share count reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
9.44%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.