503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
24.66%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 16.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
23.97%
Similar cost growth to ZETA's 29.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
24.80%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.11%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.65%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
22.24%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.23%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.53%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.67%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
29.51%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.89%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.00%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.74%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.76%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
3.27%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.43%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.88%
Net income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 40.68%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
3.38%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
50.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-14.08%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-14.08%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.