PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.24%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 16.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
20.92%
Cost growth 50-75% of ZETA's 29.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
8.62%
Similar gross profit growth to ZETA's 8.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-1.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.58%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.53%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x ZETA's 11.77%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.60%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.63%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.62%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.59%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.12%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
33.33%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.53%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.27%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.84%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.05%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.61%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
33.33%
Similar EPS growth to ZETA's 41.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
33.33%
Similar diluted EPS growth to ZETA's 41.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-22.82%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-22.82%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.