PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.75%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 16.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
17.92%
Cost growth 50-75% of ZETA's 29.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
20.01%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.21%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.51%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
20.82%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.91%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.39%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.95%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.93%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.52%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.24%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.54%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.85%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.60%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.51%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.88%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.00%
EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-7.81%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-7.81%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.