PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.67%
Similar revenue growth to ZETA's 16.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
24.74%
Similar cost growth to ZETA's 29.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
13.31%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.66%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
15.69%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.26%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.70%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.76%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.80%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.63%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.67%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.03%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.27%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.92%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.53%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.92%
Share count reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
12.92%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.