PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.39%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.31%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.67%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.81%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.57%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.90%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.80%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.33%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.04%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.80%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.76%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.18%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.89%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.60%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-9.81%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.67%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.81%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-9.81%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.