503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.85%
Similar revenue growth to ZETA's 16.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
16.95%
Cost growth 50-75% of ZETA's 29.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
14.57%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.34%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.56%
Similar total costs growth to ZETA's 11.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.63%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.31%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.72%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.99%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.34%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.05%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.99%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.76%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
5.35%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.14%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.92%
Net income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 40.68%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
5.28%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.77%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.77%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.