PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.56%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.85%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.59%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.00%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.71%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.13%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
0.62%
Total costs growth less than half of ZETA's 11.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-10.64%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.82%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.45%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.15%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.62%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-12.78%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.92%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-12.71%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.49%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.69%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.69%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-20.59%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-20.59%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.