PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.85%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 16.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
31.09%
Similar cost growth to ZETA's 29.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
17.55%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.80%
Similar R&D growth to ZETA's 14.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.64%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
18.77%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.49%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
16.27%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.71%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.99%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.12%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.82%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.26%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.49%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.71%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.04%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.68%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.29%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.28%
Share count reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.28%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.