503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.09%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.77%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
7.24%
Similar gross profit growth to ZETA's 8.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
0.14%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.05%
R&D growth 50-75% of ZETA's 14.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.31%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.90%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ZETA's 11.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.06%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.63%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.02%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.58%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.41%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.22%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.28%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.75%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.52%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.17%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.86%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.17%
Share count reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
6.17%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.