PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
24.37%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 16.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
50.60%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 29.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
21.34%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.39%
Similar R&D growth to ZETA's 14.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.55%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
20.11%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.55%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.93%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.39%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
33.08%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.01%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
313.33%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.77%
Similar pre-tax income growth to ZETA's 41.76%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
13.19%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
51.40%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.60%
Similar net income growth to ZETA's 40.68%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
9.03%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
42.86%
Similar EPS growth to ZETA's 41.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
42.86%
Similar diluted EPS growth to ZETA's 41.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-5.29%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-5.29%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.