PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.77%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-9.28%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.27%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.49%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.64%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.19%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.60%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.53%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.97%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.36%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.42%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.97%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.97%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.84%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.92%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.33%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.09%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
41.27%
Share count reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.70%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.