PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.78%
Similar revenue growth to ZETA's 16.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
72.73%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 29.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
14.54%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.27%
Similar R&D growth to ZETA's 14.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.88%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.79%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.11%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.13%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.20%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
19.84%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.63%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
37.21%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.63%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.30%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.54%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.68%
Net income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 40.68%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
3.35%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.38%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
4.45%
Share count reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-3.58%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.