PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.03%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-47.62%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.89%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.95%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.88%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.17%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.68%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.41%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.74%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.13%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.70%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.75%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.29%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.43%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.49%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.43%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.44%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.49%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.42%
Share count reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.68%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.