PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.42%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-74.75%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.94%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.39%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.88%
R&D growth 50-75% of ZETA's 14.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.09%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.70%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ZETA's 11.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.44%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.89%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.85%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.63%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.33%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-578.72%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.08%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.01%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.27%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-37.28%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.37%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.36%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.02%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.