PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.54%
Similar revenue growth to ZETA's 16.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
76.00%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 29.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
14.04%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.58%
R&D growth 50-75% of ZETA's 14.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.92%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.86%
Similar total costs growth to ZETA's 11.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.98%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.74%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.25%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.54%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.75%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
147.56%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
47.25%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 41.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
28.57%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of ZETA's 50.07%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
18.18%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
70.89%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 40.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
49.20%
Similar net margin growth to ZETA's 49.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
71.43%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
69.23%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.58%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.