PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.27%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-13.64%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
5.51%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ZETA's 8.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.22%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.78%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.67%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.90%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.72%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.18%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.06%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.87%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.07%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.50%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.21%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.39%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.03%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.01%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.10%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.67%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.18%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.37%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.