PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.86%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
73.68%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 29.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.17%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of ZETA's 8.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.10%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 14.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.89%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.18%
Similar total costs growth to ZETA's 11.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.11%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.59%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.72%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.21%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.73%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
26.92%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.51%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.11%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.53%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.50%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.12%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.32%
Share count reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.74%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.