PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.90%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 16.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
30.00%
Similar cost growth to ZETA's 29.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
23.13%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.17%
R&D growth 50-75% of ZETA's 14.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.82%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
15.87%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.12%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
29.41%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.10%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
32.04%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.57%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-28.27%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
21.89%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.76%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-1.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
30.24%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.83%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.90%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.65%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.50%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.39%
Share count reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.52%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ZETA's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.