PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
42.00%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 16.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
123.27%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 29.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
30.95%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-7.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
76.92%
R&D growth above 1.5x ZETA's 14.15%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.87%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
50.82%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
213.92%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
44.64%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
27.59%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
32.65%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.59%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.19%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
14.89%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-19.10%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.92%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.87%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-19.11%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
15.79%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.89%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.