PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.52%
Similar revenue growth to ZETA's 16.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
17.44%
Cost growth 50-75% of ZETA's 29.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
13.24%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.23%
R&D growth 50-75% of ZETA's 14.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.43%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
22.58%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.80%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.89%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.71%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.09%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.43%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
43.13%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.17%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.07%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.16%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.18%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.06%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.09%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.66%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.20%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.