PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.62%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
125.16%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 29.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-8.67%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.05%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.03%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.70%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ZETA's 11.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-206.18%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-22.36%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.89%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.88%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.33%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.40%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.05%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.53%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.14%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.01%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.57%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.81%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.30%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.