PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.60%
Similar revenue growth to ZETA's 16.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
4.73%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
15.08%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.30%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.56%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.16%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.28%
Similar total costs growth to ZETA's 11.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.40%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
13.41%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.11%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.02%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.25%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-32.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.69%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.48%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.73%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.95%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.71%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.05%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.59%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.