PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.24%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
4.05%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-3.20%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.98%
R&D growth 50-75% of ZETA's 14.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ZETA's 1.19%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.46%
Total costs growth less than half of ZETA's 11.77%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.09%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.40%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.23%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.14%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.98%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.71%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.61%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.47%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.65%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-6.59%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.45%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.00%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.33%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.13%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.