PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.10%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-48.51%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
10.64%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
16.58%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-25.73%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.02%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-12.82%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.10%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.98%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.31%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.96%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
61.93%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1825.51%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1928.92%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 50.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1730.30%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1873.85%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 40.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1979.85%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 49.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2300.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2300.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.33%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.