PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.26%
Revenue growth 50-75% of ZETA's 16.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
59.00%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 29.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
0.03%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.19%
R&D growth less than half of ZETA's 14.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
133.33%
G&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 15.05%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
39.59%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 14.63%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.62%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
33.70%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.02%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.66%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.25%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.12%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
33.90%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.80%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.73%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.34%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-8.62%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.13%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.53%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.53%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.34%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.80%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.