PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.27%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-40.38%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.68%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.63%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-29.74%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-12.27%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.49%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.29%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.36%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.12%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
37.53%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.88%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.96%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.87%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.15%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 41.76%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
34.25%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of ZETA's 50.07%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
44.32%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.85%
Net income growth below 50% of ZETA's 40.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.20%
Net margin growth 50-75% of ZETA's 49.14%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
17.65%
EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.65%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.08%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.