PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.59%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 16.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
58.38%
Cost growth above 1.5x ZETA's 29.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.95%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
84.42%
R&D growth above 1.5x ZETA's 14.15%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.58%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
71.27%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ZETA's 11.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.54%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-57.57%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.17%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.14%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.09%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.16%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-40.73%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while ZETA shows 50.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.71%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-40.74%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.05%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.67%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.67%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.