PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.63%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-39.80%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.58%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.02%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-48.23%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
237.05%
G&A growth above 1.5x ZETA's 15.05%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-21.85%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.40%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ZETA's 1.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-9.00%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.36%
EBITDA decline while ZETA shows 406.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.92%
EBITDA margin decline while ZETA shows 363.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.36%
Operating income decline while ZETA shows 68.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.12%
Operating margin decline while ZETA shows 72.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
19.59%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.43%
Pre-tax income decline while ZETA shows 41.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.08%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.34%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.11%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.06%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.39%
Diluted share reduction while ZETA shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.