PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.28%
Revenue growth below 50% of ZETA's 16.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.96%
Cost growth less than half of ZETA's 29.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
0.61%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ZETA's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.87%
R&D growth 50-75% of ZETA's 14.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while ZETA shows 14.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.88%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-22.01%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.10%
D&A growth while ZETA reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
169.33%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
450.65%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 363.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
145.15%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 68.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
142.06%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 72.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-42.96%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
62.53%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 41.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
60.48%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x ZETA's 50.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
5.19%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
104.56%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 40.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
101.99%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 49.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
108.33%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
108.33%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 41.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.36%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.