PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.11%
Revenue decline while ZETA shows 16.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.13%
Cost reduction while ZETA shows 29.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.35%
Gross profit decline while ZETA shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.77%
Margin expansion while ZETA shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.69%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.29%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.53%
Total costs reduction while ZETA shows 11.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.78%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.51%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.64%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.52%
Operating income growth below 50% of ZETA's 68.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.77%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-51.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.86%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ZETA's 41.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.00%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.78%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.02%
Net income decline while ZETA shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.97%
Net margin decline while ZETA shows 49.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.00%
EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ZETA shows 41.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.45%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.38%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.