PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.73%
Similar revenue growth to ZETA's 16.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
36.80%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x ZETA's 29.86%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
14.29%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.17%
R&D reduction while ZETA shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-44.43%
G&A reduction while ZETA shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
29.04%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ZETA's 14.63%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.33%
Operating expenses reduction while ZETA shows 1.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.57%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ZETA's 11.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.98%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
35.92%
EBITDA growth below 50% of ZETA's 406.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.99%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 363.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.92%
Operating income growth 50-75% of ZETA's 68.32%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
15.45%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 72.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
50.54%
Other expenses growth while ZETA reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.00%
Similar pre-tax income growth to ZETA's 41.76%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
16.37%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 50.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
37.03%
Tax expense growth while ZETA reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.99%
Similar net income growth to ZETA's 40.68%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
16.36%
Net margin growth below 50% of ZETA's 49.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
39.13%
Similar EPS growth to ZETA's 41.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
39.13%
Similar diluted EPS growth to ZETA's 41.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ZETA's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.